13,764

1

page 4 of Section 1.16. From the discussion I had with

2

Professor Penniman, it would appear that the word

3

"any" on line 38 was required by the presence of the

4

word "that" on line 39. I was wondering if we could delete

5

both of these words without changing the substance of this

6

particular section and clear up any misgivings or possible

7

misinterpretations of the word "any" in this instance.

8

THE PRESIDENT: I am not sure that I followed

9

your change. Would you give it to us again.

10

Delegate Burgess.

11

DELEGATE BURGESS: I was suggesting the possi-

12

bility of changing on line 38 — the deletion of the

13

style change which included the word "any" and which was

14

apparently required by the presence of the word "that"

15

on line 39.

16

According to the discussion with Professor

17

Penniman, the presence of the word "that" required for

18

smoothness the insertion of the word "any" which does

19

give a little trouble to some of us that are reading this,

20

and I wonder if we could delete on line 38 the word

21

"any" and on line 38 the word "that" and still retain the

smoothness and continuity and not change the substance as
adopted by the Committee of the Whole.