|
|
13,705
|
|
1
|
other ones was growing out of this whole discussion here.
|
|
2
|
I think it is not a change from the substance of the
|
|
3
|
Committee or of the expectation of the Committee of the
|
|
4
|
Whole.
|
|
5
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Hanson.
|
|
6
|
DELEGATE HANSON: I would probably agree that it
|
|
7
|
is not a change from the intention of the Committee, but
|
|
8
|
it seems to me it is indeed a substantive change.
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE PENNIMAN: I think it is not. For
|
|
10
|
example, if it happened on the 140th day it would be
|
|
11
|
difficult for them to extend the session beyond 150. It is
|
|
12
|
easy enough to extend beyond the ninety days.
|
|
13
|
DELEGATE HANSON: May I state what bothers me
|
|
14
|
about this is Delegate Penniman's response to it. In
|
|
15
|
Section 3.15 we provide that the General Assembly may
|
|
16
|
extend its regular session. It seems to me that if we
|
|
17
|
write this here as the 80th day we have two inconsistencies,
|
|
18
|
the one possibly which I was suggesting earlier, but a
|
|
19
|
second and perhaps more serious one when viewed in the
|
|
20
|
light of 3.15 in that we are creating here a new way in
|
|
21
|
which the length of the General Assembly may be extended.
|