|
|
13,672
|
|
1
|
I take it, that Section 3 is intended in any way as a
|
|
2
|
binding interpretation of Section 2.06, either to enlarge
|
|
3
|
or restrict the power of the General Assembly.
|
|
4
|
DELEGATE PENNIMAN: We do not consider it to be
|
|
5
|
a constitutional definition. It is what you might
|
|
6
|
consider to be a legislative definition and only an interim
|
|
7
|
measure.
|
|
8
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Grant.
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE GRANT: I only point this out that the
|
|
10
|
old qualification section had "infamous crime" Instead of
|
|
11
|
"serious crime" and this is why I believe the dichotomy
|
|
12
|
exists right now.
|
|
13
|
THE PRESIDENT: Any questions to Section 2?
|
|
14
|
Delegate Gill.
|
|
15
|
DELEGATE GILL: In the schedule of legislation
|
|
16
|
there is just a typographical error.
|
|
17
|
THE PRESIDENT: Let us hold it until we come
|
|
18
|
to that.
|
|
19
|
This is Article 2. Any other questions?
|
|
20
|
The Chair hears none.
|
|
21
|
Proceed to Article 3.
|