|
|
13,661
|
|
1
|
that we had on at least some of the sections of the staff,
|
|
2
|
advisor of the Substantive Committee, or by the Committee
|
|
3
|
Chairmen, that one can make what is in retrospect a
|
|
4
|
terribly obvious error and I will note that one when I
|
|
5
|
come to it in Article III.
|
|
6
|
There is also an error of comission in Article
|
|
7
|
which I will note.
|
|
8
|
I think that we have not made any other changes
|
|
9
|
or failed to make changes except as we intended to do. It
|
|
10
|
may be as we discuss this that you will find other errors
|
|
11
|
of omission or comission in our work.
|
|
12
|
If we turn then to the preamble and to Article
|
|
13
|
I, there are no changes from the last version to Section
|
|
14
|
1.08 and in Section 1.08 under the heading of Removal
|
|
15
|
of Criminal Cases in lines 17, we made the subject singular
|
|
16
|
and also made it clear that it is in a case involving
|
|
17
|
crime punishable by death, not in a case punishable by
|
|
18
|
death. There is no change except to clarify that it is
|
|
19
|
the crime not the case that is punishable by death.
|
|
20
|
The staff advisor for the Committee was with us at the
|
|
21
|
time that change was made. That is in line 17.
|