|
|
13,653
|
|
1
|
alone. That would mean, to come back to my illustration,
|
|
2
|
that if we had one section on which a division was called
|
|
3
|
for that provided how members of the General Assembly were
|
|
4
|
to be elected, the Chair would have to rule that it was
|
|
5
|
not divisible because if it alone were adopted and the
|
|
6
|
remaining portions of Article III were not, there would be
|
|
7
|
no provision for a General Assembly, but you would have
|
|
8
|
a provision for election of legislators to a non-existing
|
|
9
|
General Assembly. This would not make sense.
|
|
10
|
The net result is that on such examination of the
|
|
11
|
entire Constitution, as the Chair has been able to give, I
|
|
12
|
do not think it is possible to have a division of any
|
|
13
|
section from any article with the possible exception of
|
|
14
|
some sections in Article I, possibly some in Article X,
|
|
15
|
possibly some in the Schedule of Transitional Provisions,
|
|
16
|
and some in the Schedule of Legislation.
|
|
17
|
This is importnat because it means that if you
|
|
18
|
desire to present separately some question as to a
|
|
19
|
particular section, your only real opportunity to do so is
|
|
20
|
when the section is open for amendment at which time you
|
|
21
|
can submit an amendment.
|