|
|
13,501
|
|
1
|
think it was designed, as was pointed out, to accommodate
|
|
2
|
some of the situations which are outlined in Section
|
|
3
|
3.23, and I suppose it would accommodate a law pertaining
|
|
4
|
to public education or a law pertaining to natural
|
|
5
|
environment and resources, but I submit to you that
|
|
6
|
under Section 3.23, a law on either on those subjects
|
|
7
|
would cover one county, cover two counties, it could
|
|
8
|
cover ten counties, and it would not necessarily be
|
|
9
|
confined to one county.
|
|
10
|
Also, in the amendment on lines 15, 16, and
|
|
11
|
17, it savs no law enpowering a county to exercise a
|
|
12
|
power or perform a function, et cetera, shall be subject
|
|
13
|
to referendum.
|
|
14
|
Now, unless this is ready in connection with
|
|
15
|
Section 2.23, and there is no compulsion in connection
|
|
16
|
with the section itself that it must be read in connection
|
|
17
|
with Section 2.23, that part empowering the county to
|
|
18
|
perform a function, it seems to me could cover a whole
|
|
19
|
variety of situations, and would simply be a trouble
|
|
20
|
maker, a litigation maker.
|
|
21
|
It would raise the question whether the law
|