|
|
13,495
|
|
1
|
not the logic, sir.
|
|
2
|
THE PRESIDENT: Very well.
|
|
3
|
Delegate Willoner.
|
|
4
|
DELEGATE WILLONER: Delegate Koss, why did
|
|
5
|
you leave out the ^Section 8 of the 3.23, that no law
|
|
6
|
empowering a county to exercise a power or perform a
|
|
7
|
function is petitionable to referendum?
|
|
8
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Koss.
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE KOSS: It was the assumption that
|
|
10
|
unless that were implemented by the local governing
|
|
11
|
body, that it would be petitionable, according to the
|
|
12
|
charter when it was implemented by local governing body.
|
|
13
|
THE PRESIDENT: Any further discussion?
|
|
14
|
Delegate Bamberger?
|
|
15
|
DELEGATE BAMBERGER: Mr. Chairman, I would
|
|
16
|
appreciate it if some of the sponsors of the amendment
|
|
17
|
would explain to us the rationale behind what I understand
|
|
18
|
from the Chair and from Delegate Koss is the effect of
|
|
19
|
this. If, for instance, there is a law which applies to
|
|
20
|
some multi-county governmental unit, or which affected, let
|
|
21
|
us say, only two counties, why should that be referred to
|