|
|
13,493
|
|
1
|
on referendum under this section and, yet, by strict
|
|
2
|
reading of the words, I am not sure it would be.
|
|
3
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Koss.
|
|
4
|
DELEGATE KOSS: Delegate Lord, I think you
|
|
5
|
assumed our intention. Any law under the current Consti-
|
|
6
|
tution which affects more than one county is referrable
|
|
7
|
only as a public general law. It was our intention
|
|
8
|
to continue that.
|
|
9
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Lord, the intent was
|
|
10
|
exactly the converse of what you suggested. The
|
|
11
|
intent here was to have referendum locally only of a law
|
|
12
|
applicable to one county only.
|
|
13
|
If a law was applicable to anything more than
|
|
14
|
one county, it would be referrable only under Section
|
|
15
|
2.10 on a statewide basis.
|
|
16
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Lord.
|
|
17
|
DELEGATE LORD: Mr. President, maybe I had
|
|
18
|
better address this guestion to you. Would this mean
|
|
19
|
that if a law has some effect outside of one county that
|
|
20
|
the only way that this law could be knocked out would
|
|
21
|
be by statewide referendum?
|