|
|
13,490
|
|
1
|
remote situation admittedly, but very possible occurence
|
|
2
|
where a county may not be satisfied with the redistricting
|
|
3
|
procedure established by the General Assembly, and may
|
|
4
|
desire to petition that particular portion of the law to
|
|
5
|
referendum.
|
|
6
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Koss.
|
|
7
|
DELEGATE KOSS: It would seem to me that
|
|
8
|
in order for it to be subject to referendum under this
|
|
9
|
proposed 2.14, it would have to be a law -- I can't
|
|
10
|
conceive of the possibility of a redistricting law
|
|
11
|
applicable only in one county.
|
|
12
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Sollins.
|
|
13
|
DELEGATE SOLLINS: Chairman Koss, would you
|
|
14
|
accept an amendment to your proposal here, adding "legis-
|
|
15
|
lative apportionment and districting or congressional
|
|
16
|
districting"?
|
|
17
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Koss.
|
|
18
|
DELEGATE KOSS: Delegate Sollins, I am not
|
|
19
|
convinced that it is necessary. Certainly it was not the
|
|
20
|
intent, but I am not convinced that that kind of additional
|
|
21
|
languaae is necessary.
|