|
|
13,475
|
|
1
|
for this kind of problem, and it was our express intention
|
|
2
|
that where a statute gave a procedure, set up a mechanism,
|
|
3
|
that simply because that mechanism or procedure was adopted
|
|
4
|
pursuant to a provision of the prior Constitution, that
|
|
5
|
the mechanism or procedure was not invalidated and was
|
|
6
|
not in any way less lawful under the new Constitution.
|
|
7
|
Frankly, I am perfectly satisfied that the
|
|
8
|
thing probably doesn't do anything, but in the final analysi
|
|
9
|
if you vote it in you are just cluttering up the
|
|
10
|
Constitution. I think we could have put in a dozen or more
|
|
11
|
provisions like it on the same philosophy of scare, fear,
|
|
12
|
fright, that we might be leaving something out, and I still
|
|
13
|
oppose the amendment.
|
|
14
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Are you ready for the question?
|
|
15
|
Delegate Clagett.
|
|
16
|
DELEGATE CLAGETT: I have one question to ask
|
|
17
|
the Chair:
|
|
18
|
Is it not true that by Article 23(a), which
|
|
19
|
incorporates 11(e) of the Constitution, and where we keep
|
|
20
|
23(e) alive, but likewise keep alive those provisions which
|
|
21
|
are incorporated in it from 11(e)?
|