|
|
13,465
|
|
1
|
commented upon is absolutely true. We are not authorized
|
|
2
|
under the enabling-act to include in the schedule of
|
|
3
|
legislation matters which we would like to see there, or whi
|
|
4
|
we think ought to be there. We are limited to two categories
|
|
5
|
of matters, matters in the present Constitution, which
|
|
6
|
we have eliminated from the Constitution, and which must
|
|
7
|
not, should or ought, but which must be continued because
|
|
8
|
there is not time for the legislature to act; and, secondly,
|
|
9
|
matters which require legislation before the legislature
|
|
10
|
can act, because of the provision which we hadincluded in the
|
|
11
|
Constitution, in the new Constitution.
|
|
12
|
In thelight of those two premises, and in
|
|
13
|
the light of Delegate Grant's statement that this provision,
|
|
14
|
section 33(b) is not intended to grant to the municipalities
|
|
15
|
any powers they do not have, and in the light of the
|
|
16
|
provisions of section 7.05, which provides expressly for
|
|
17
|
the continuance of existing powers of the municipality,
|
|
18
|
the Chair suggests that the discussion has left it far from
|
|
19
|
clear that this section meets either of the two requirements
|
|
20
|
and does not, if it doesn't, does not merely reaffirm what
|
|
21
|
is in section 7.05.
|