|
|
13,456
|
|
1
|
Delegate Grant?
|
|
2
|
DELEGATE GRANT: 7.05, 7.06, 7.07.
|
|
3
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Clagett.
|
|
4
|
DELEGATE CLAGETT: Delegate Grant, would not
|
|
5
|
this have the effect of law, which would be equivalent to
|
|
6
|
the act of the General Assembly overriding the requirement
|
|
7
|
of Section 7.05, that no alteration of boundary would take
|
|
8
|
place without the consent of the county and the municipality
|
|
9
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Grant.
|
|
10
|
DELEGATE CLAGETT: Except for the fact within
|
|
11
|
itself it cannot be inconsistent with the provisions of this
|
|
12
|
Constitution.
|
|
13
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Clagett.
|
|
14
|
DELEGATE CLAGETT: Well then, as I understand,
|
|
15
|
what you are telling me is that the consent of the county
|
|
|
would not be required.
|
|
17
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Grant.
|
|
18
|
DELEGATE GRANT: I point out essentially it has
|
|
19
|
got nothing to do with annexation.
|
|
20
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Clagett.
|
|
21
|
DELEGATE CLAGETT: If the new charter provided
|
