|
|
13,453
|
|
1
|
local legislation, or at least a great part of it in this
|
|
2
|
State, was with regard to municipalities, and it was a
|
|
3
|
great evil. As a result, in 1948, the Legislature took
|
|
4
|
steps trying by the Express Powers Act with regard to
|
|
5
|
municipalities to end this, but the Sobeloff Commission in
|
|
6
|
its third report recommended that a constitutional amend-
|
|
7
|
ment go even further and grant home rule to municipalities,
|
|
8
|
and that constitutional amendment was then passed in 1954.
|
|
9
|
This section is at the heart of the Sobeloff Commission
|
|
10
|
recommendations and at the heart of home rule in munici-
|
|
11
|
palities. What it did at that time is require the General
|
|
12
|
Assembly to act only by general law with regard to
|
|
13
|
municipalities. At the same time it permitted municipalities
|
|
14
|
to obtain powers by changing their charter as long as the
|
|
15
|
General Assembly general law did not preclude that, and
|
|
16
|
municipalities have used that since that time and since
|
|
17
|
that time there has been no local legislation with regard
|
|
18
|
to municipalities.
|
|
19
|
This is an important section, but we are putting!
|
|
20
|
it in the statutory provisions and not in the transitory
|
|
21
|
provisions so that the Legislature could change it at any
|