|
|
11,716
|
|
1
|
written it originally. We have had enough colloquy on the
|
|
2
|
subject to indicate that the committee doesn't feel that
|
|
3
|
there is any difference between the two. Now, if we are
|
|
4
|
going to have a vote on that one, that is one thing, and
|
|
5
|
then I am ready to go on to answer.
|
|
6
|
THE PRESIDENT: The Chair suggests to you that
|
|
7
|
the statement made by the chairman of the Committee on
|
|
8
|
Style was that while no change in substance was intended,
|
|
9
|
the language that is now suggested by Delegate Barrick
|
|
10
|
which was the language used prior did not carry out the
|
|
11
|
intent of the Committee of the Whole as indicated in the
|
|
12
|
colloquy so that what we would be doing would be going righ'
|
|
13
|
back to where we were before and having language which the
|
|
14
|
Committee on Style does not think is carrying out the
|
|
15
|
intent indicated on the floor.
|
|
16
|
For what purpose does Delegate Cleason rise?
|
|
17
|
DELEGATE GLEASON: Mr. Chairman, it is a little
|
|
18
|
difficult. I can follow one printed amendment, but when we
|
|
19
|
are dealing with one unprinted amendment which is a sub-
|
|
20
|
stitute for another unprinted amendment T am afraid I would
|
|
21
|
fall off the log. I wish we could get at least the Hanson
|