|
|
11,698
|
|
1
|
Legislature would define it only. How did you zone it? I
|
|
2
|
doubt that they would.
|
|
3
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Clagett.
|
|
4
|
DELEGATE CLAGETT: May I ask you a question?
|
|
5
|
Where we use the phraseology "devoted to agricultural use",
|
|
6
|
the reading of that Language and understanding the words in
|
|
7
|
their natural context and meaning, would they not include
|
|
8
|
"and requiring agricultural use" as being one of the
|
|
9
|
criteria to determine such use when defined by the General
|
|
10
|
Assembly?
|
|
11
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Sherbow.
|
|
12
|
DELEGATE SHERBOW: Yes.
|
|
13
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Clagett.
|
|
14
|
DELEGATE CLAGETT: Shifting to the phrase
|
|
15
|
"agricultural property," do I likewise understand that that
|
|
16
|
phrase would include as a definitive criteria agricultural
|
|
17
|
or bona fide agricultural use and could not be excluded by
|
|
18
|
the mere paper zoning categorization?
|
|
19
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Sherbow.
|
|
20
|
DELEGATE SHERBOW: I think that is correct.
|
|
21
|
THE PRESIDENT: Any other questions?
|