|
|
11,682
|
|
1
|
the sole test for whether or not property was agricultural
|
|
2
|
property was that it be devoted to agricultural use. Now,
|
|
3
|
since you have deleted that description and have just put
|
|
4
|
in the generic adjective "agricultural," is it the intention
|
|
5
|
of the committee that the sole test for whether a property is
|
|
6
|
agricultural or not be determined by its use?
|
|
7
|
THE PRESIDENT: Delegate Penniman.
|
|
8
|
DELEGATE PENNIMAN: Let me in some sense perhaps
|
|
9
|
avoid; your question but state what we did and then if you
|
|
10
|
have a further question, fine.
|
|
11
|
As it came to us from a subcommittee, it was
|
|
12
|
changed for purposes -- the subcommittee thought of
|
|
13
|
clarification by changing it to "agricultural property" as
|
|
14
|
defined by the General Assembly law. When this was dis-
|
|
15
|
cussed in the subcommittee the question was raised, Had then
|
|
16
|
been any substantive change?
|
|
17
|
The question was put to those who were involved
|
|
18
|
in our subcommittee and Mr. Walker Lewis who was there as
|
|
19
|
the staff adviser to the Committee on State Finance and
|
|
20
|
Taxation, and in turn it was put to other members of the
|
|
21
|
Committee on State Finance and Taxation and we were assured
|