|
|
11.659
|
|
1
|
government over the District of Columbia. To answer your
|
|
2
|
parliamentary inquiry, Delegate Burdette, I make this
|
|
3
|
suggestion: I think this is a matter that the Chair would
|
|
4
|
request the staff advisor to the committee to have
|
|
5
|
researched this evening. The Committee on Style has the
|
|
6
|
privileged status of being able to move for reconsideration
|
|
7
|
at any time, and would be afforded this opportunity so that
|
|
8
|
the question could be raised again, but I think we ought
|
|
9
|
to have more definite answers before it is decided.
|
|
10
|
DELEGATE BURDETTE: I might say, Ishould if there is
|
|
11
|
any parliamentary way to do it, and if it should seem
|
|
12
|
under any circumstances necessary to move it, if it be
|
|
13
|
possible to move it, I am trying to move it -- some such
|
|
14
|
language: "but this section shall not be construed to apply
|
|
15
|
to the territory now in the District of Columbia."
|
|
16
|
THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think this is a matter
|
|
17
|
that can be left to the Committee on Style. It is the intent
|
|
18
|
of the Convention, it is abundantly clear that it is not intended
|
|
19
|
by section 2.04 to enfranchise residents of the District
|
|
20
|
of Columbia.
|
|
21
|
DELEGATE HARDWICKE: I would like to point out
|