|
|
11,638
|
|
1
|
in light of the comment that has been made, I should make
|
|
2
|
a statement now that was just made to me by Mr. Smolka, the
|
|
3
|
staff advisor to the committee. I asked him if there were
|
|
4
|
anyany authorative recent decisions of the Supreme Court
|
|
5
|
as to whether ownership of property as a qualification for
|
|
6
|
holding office was a denial of equal protection of the laws.
|
|
7
|
His answer was that so far as he is aware, and so
|
|
8
|
far as the committee was able to ascertain, there are no
|
|
9
|
recent decisions squarely on the point; that there are a
|
|
10
|
number of municipalities which have such qualification in
|
|
11
|
Maryland at the present time.
|
|
12
|
His opinion as adviser to the committee is that
|
|
13
|
if those provisions are attacked, the courts will hold them
|
|
14
|
invalid, but they can give you no assurance that that
|
|
15
|
result will follow, and can give you no absolute authority.
|
|
16
|
I don't know whether that helps the situation
|
|
17
|
or muddies the waters, but there it is for what it is worth.
|
|
18
|
Are you ready for the question?
|
|
19
|
The Clerk will ring the quorum bell.
|
|
20
|
The question arises on the adoption of amendment
|
|
21
|
No. 6, which would delete all of section 2.05 comprising
|