11,624

1

interpreted to mean that the bonding company could require

2

ownership of property in order to issue a bond, and I

3

should think that it something we would not want to happen.

4

I agree with Delegate Sherbow that if the language is

5

deleted, the General Assembly certainly has the power

6

to require a bond, and I suggest that with the language in

7

here there is the possible evil of the bonding company

8

being able to require ownership of some property and thus

9

prevent people from holding office.

10

THE PRESIDENT: Is there any further discussion?

11

Delegate Ulrich.

12

DELEGATE ULRICH: I move the previous question.

13

THE PRESIDENT: Is there a second?

14

(Whereupon, the motion was duly seconded.)

15

THE PRESIDENT: The previous question having

16

been moved and seconded, all in favor, signify by saying

17

aye; contrary, no. The ayes have it, it is so ordered.

18

The question arises on the adoption of Amendment

19

No. 5. The Clerk will ring the quorum bell.

20

The question arises on the adoption of Amendment

21

5 to delete lines 43, 44 and 45 on page 2. A vote aye