|
|
11,543
|
|
1
|
have been "qualified voter", and I would hope it could
|
|
2
|
be changed.
|
|
3
|
Section 2.12 is now one which includes the portion
|
|
4
|
moved down from 2.10, which puts it in sequential order
|
|
5
|
and clarifies the timing of the suspension of the laws
|
|
6
|
and the period of that suspension which is the same as
|
|
7
|
provided in the original decision of the committee and of
|
|
a
|
the Committee of the Whole, but it is, I think, made
|
|
9
|
absolutely clear in Section 6,13 which is a continuation
|
|
10
|
of the effects of the memorandum and is again part of
|
|
11
|
the slight change in wording, but to correspond with the
|
|
12
|
sequence.
|
|
13
|
Again, one more error on our part, on the
|
|
14
|
part of the committee, and that is in line 27 on page 5,
|
|
15
|
there is "provided for" when it should have been
|
|
16
|
"prescribed", and if I may take you back to page 3, in
|
|
17
|
line 24, and again in line 42, we say "provide" when we
|
|
18
|
should have said "prescribe".
|
|
19
|
The wisdom of Delegate Marvin Smith came too
|
|
20
|
late to affect the failures of our original draft, so it
|
|
21
|
went in with these "provides" when they should have been
|