|
|
10,919
|
|
1
|
plan to cut the welfare budget.
|
|
2
|
Wouldn't it be better to deny the B&0 in this
|
|
3
|
constitution this right of subsidy, or tax break, and
|
|
4
|
increase the welfare budget?
|
|
6
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: That may well be. The
|
|
6
|
point is here we can't take the exemption away from the
|
|
7
|
B&0 in the absence of its doing something which by law
|
|
8
|
removes the exemption.
|
|
9
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Mentzer.
|
|
10
|
DELEGATE MENTZER: Delegate Gallagher, did
|
|
11
|
your Committee consider whether this provision could
|
|
12
|
have been in the constitution in the schedule, and although
|
|
13
|
the schedule is primarily for the temporary items of
|
|
14
|
transition it can also be used as an appendix to carry
|
|
15
|
over those things which do not belong or seem incongruent
|
|
16
|
with the main body of the constitution?
|
|
17
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: We felt again that
|
|
18
|
because of the importance of the subject matter and the
|
|
19
|
fact that it had been handled on a constitutional basis
|
|
20
|
in the past that we ought not to jeopardize our ability to
|
|
21
|
remove this exemption by putting it in any secondary status,
|