|
|
10,890
|
|
1
|
the Committee of tht Whole did on eliminating RP-2,
|
|
2
|
Section 4.
|
|
S
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Willoner.
|
|
4
|
DELEGATE WILLONER: Mr. Chairman, it was my
|
|
6
|
understanding at the time that this provision, Section 9
|
|
6
|
of RP-1, was discussed, the suspension of the constitution
|
|
7
|
went to the suspension not only of personal rights but it
|
|
8
|
went to the suspension of the constitution as a whole,
|
|
9
|
and I -think in discussing this with you I thought we
|
|
10
|
arrived at the conclusion that this was inconsistent
|
|
11
|
with it, but it was an appropriate limitation, or I should
|
|
12
|
say exception to the suspension rule.
|
|
13
|
The colloquy between you and the Chairman
|
|
14
|
of the Committee of the Whole indicated that you feel
|
|
15
|
that the provision of Section 9 only applies to personal
|
|
16
|
rights.
|
|
17
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Gallagher.
|
|
18
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: I was merely saying by
|
|
19
|
way of example that we do not intend that it should apply
|
|
20
|
to the suspension of any of the rights guaranteed under
|
|
21
|
the personal rights section. We try to limit this just to
|