|
|
10,880
|
|
1
|
length. I might say we had great pressure on us from the
|
|
2
|
state civil defense organization to pass a very lenghthy
|
|
3
|
kind of emergency constitutional provision, but we felt that
|
|
4
|
we wanted to reduce it to a skeleton form, to merely
|
|
5
|
provide that the General Assembly could pass legislation
|
|
6
|
in these two areas anticipating a disaster, and at the
|
|
7
|
same time in so doing set aside or allow the possibility
|
|
8
|
to set aside some constitutional procedures.
|
|
9
|
If we didn't include this in the constitution
|
|
10
|
then the General Assembly could do nothing to anticipate
|
|
11
|
an emergency except as would be allowed by the constitution.
|
|
12
|
If this would be the case, the General Assembly might find
|
|
13
|
that it could not adequately handle an anticipated disaster.
|
|
14
|
Consequently, we feel the language is necessary.
|
|
15
|
I might say the Committee went back and forth
|
|
16
|
three or four times before it ultimately decided to do it.
|
|
17
|
This language in 3.19 is the best coming together of
|
|
18
|
language we could arrive at after studying the Rhode Island
|
|
19
|
and New York constitutions in both of these regards.
|
|
20
|
We felt that this was the best method of approaching the
|
|
21
|
problem.
|