|
|
10,875
|
|
1
|
in the light of your answer to the question asked by
|
|
2
|
Delegate Fox.
|
|
9
|
You indicated that if Section 303(b) were deleted,
|
|
4
|
Section 303(c) could stand alone, although somewhat
|
|
6
|
shakily.
|
|
6
|
If that should happen, what would determine,
|
|
7
|
under 303(c), the year in which congressional redistricting
|
|
8
|
is to be effective? I am reading from lines 8 and 9.
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: I. think, Mr. Chairman,
|
|
10
|
that that would depend upon the will of the legislature
|
|
11
|
as expressed in a resolution or some other indication
|
|
12
|
that they plan to take redistricting up. Perhaps it
|
|
13
|
might also be a court order to redistrict.
|
|
14
|
THE CHAIRMAN: It would not be contemplated
|
|
15
|
in that event that the Commission could be a self-
|
|
16
|
starter, so to speak?
|
|
17
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: No, sir. In order to make
|
|
18
|
it a self-starter, we would have to provide additional
|
|
19
|
language in 303(c). It is interesting to note that
|
|
20
|
prior to Westbury v. Sanders' some states had not
|
|
21
|
redistricted for as long as 40 years. Consequently,
|
|
|
I think we would need more than the language in 303(c)
|