|
|
10,872
|
|
1
|
redistricting procedure, to stand even though Section
|
|
2
|
303(b), that tries to set a rigid standard, should be
|
|
3
|
deleted?
|
|
4
|
I notice there is no date in Section 303(c) , and
|
|
6
|
there is one in 303(b) , which is why I ask the question.
|
|
6
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Gallagher.
|
|
7
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: Yes, it would be possible
|
|
8
|
for 303(c) to stand by itself, but it would be a wobbly
|
|
9
|
kind of stand.
|
|
10
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Koss, did you have a
|
|
11
|
q uestion?
|
|
12
|
DELEGATE KOSS: Chairman Gallagher, I was
|
|
13
|
interested in what the implications of the inclusion are
|
|
14
|
with reference to court resort. Without a provision in
|
|
15
|
this constitution, would the federal courts be the only
|
|
16
|
avenue for redress?
|
|
17
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Gallagher.
|
|
18
|
DELEGATE GALLAGHER: No , I don't think so.
|
|
19
|
I think you could go to the state courts as well.
|
|
20
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Carson.
|
|
21
|
DELEGATE CARSON: Chairman Gallagher, the last
|