|
|
10,860
|
|
1
|
boundaries that we would anticipate that one could jump
|
|
2
|
the Chesapeake Bay in order to keep a single congressional
|
|
3
|
district. In this respecttwe say that we differ from
|
|
4
|
what we have urged with respect to legislative districts,
|
|
5
|
General Assembly districts, where we do not contemplate
|
|
6
|
it would or should be necessary because of the smallness
|
|
7
|
of those areas or for other reasons as well, but here we
|
|
8
|
would anticipate the possibility of jumping the Bay, if it
|
|
9
|
became -necessary, although we believe that when we have
|
|
10
|
said that due regard shall be given to natural barriers
|
|
11
|
this should not be done lightly, that any of these natural
|
|
12
|
barriers should be jumped.
|
|
13
|
That concludes my comments on congressional
|
|
14
|
districting. We are not schedule, according to the
|
|
15
|
Congressional Quarterly, to get a ninth congressman in 1970,
|
|
16
|
although there does still appear to be some possibility that
|
|
17
|
we could obtain a ninth congressman. Under the constitutional
|
|
18
|
language here and under the Acts of the Congress, the State
|
|
19
|
would have to be redistricted. We could not have this
|
|
20
|
ninth congressman if we got him to run at large. We would
|
|
21
|
have to have districts throughout for all congressional
|