|
|
10,838
|
|
1
|
As pointed out in the opinion read by Judge
|
|
2
|
Sherbow, the present language is oratorical as far as the
|
|
3
|
first part of it, the second part of it is mandatory.
|
|
4
|
I would also like to point out in Section 60
|
|
5
|
of Article 3, which the Committee did not even consider --
|
|
6
|
that is, giving the General Assembly the power to suspend
|
|
7
|
a sentence or to have an indeterminate sentence or to
|
|
8
|
release on parole -- was put in the constitution to get
|
|
9
|
around this provision, and this provision has been left
|
|
10
|
out at this point.
|
|
11
|
Therefore, I would assume that if we leave it
|
|
12
|
out, the courts will no longer be able to parole or
|
|
13
|
provide indeterminate sentences or suspend sentences,
|
|
14
|
which is the present practice today.
|
|
15
|
This particular provision has a lot of problems
|
|
16
|
in it. There are states where this language has been
|
|
17
|
held to prevent judicial review of legislative acts,
|
|
16
|
and it should not be in the constitution, at least with
|
|
19
|
the "shall" in there.
|
|
20
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Are you ready for the question?
|
|
21
|
The Clerk will ring the quorum bell.
|