|
|
10,835
|
|
1
|
this veritable fourth branch of government by invoking the
|
|
2
|
separation of powers theory or using the non-delegation
|
|
5
|
doctrine or requiring a full and complete de novo judicial
|
|
4
|
determination. These efforts had no more success than
|
|
5
|
had the plaintiff in the case of King Kanute v. D. C.
|
|
6
|
I will only say this. The court went on to say:
|
|
7
|
"The early fears of the bar and bench have largely
|
|
8
|
disappeared with experience." Yet, in this same case
|
|
9
|
one of the five judges in the court of appeals hearing this
|
|
10
|
case said the separation of powers as written in the
|
|
11
|
constitution means what it says.
|
|
12
|
It so happens I agree with Judge Henderson
|
|
13
|
and with Delegate Macdonald when they say it just isn't
|
|
14
|
true, and therefore I shall vote against the Committee
|
|
15
|
Recommendation.
|
|
16
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Does any other delegate desire
|
|
17
|
to speak in favor of the recommendation?
|
|
18
|
DELEGATE ANDERSON: Mr. Chairman, I rise to
|
|
19
|
speak in favor of the Committee recommendation, notwithstand-
|
|
20
|
ing the distinguished spokesman against this provision.
|
|
21
|
As you know, this came up in the general rights
|