|
|
10,831
|
|
1
|
that we are recognizing the general worth of the
|
|
2
|
principle, but we are not saying that it is one which has
|
|
3
|
to be strictly observed.
|
|
4
|
That is the vice in this proposal which I see,
|
|
5
|
and I urge you to vote against it. It will lead to nothing
|
|
6
|
but trouble.
|
|
7
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Does any other delegate desire
|
|
8
|
to speak in favor of the amendment?
|
|
9
|
Delegate Singer.
|
|
10
|
DELEGATE SINGER: Mr. Chairman, and fellow
|
|
11
|
delegates, the historical perspective is that the separation
|
|
12
|
of powers has never been construed to be a separate and
|
|
13
|
distinct separation of governmental power.
|
|
14
|
There has always been in the history of this
|
|
15
|
country a blending and merging of powers so that there
|
|
16
|
have been, ever since we have had this principle, examples
|
|
17
|
existing in which one branch of government exercised the
|
|
18
|
powers of one or both of the other branches of government.
|
|
19
|
We have had a provision similar to this in all of
|
|
20
|
the state constitutions of Maryland from 1776. In the
|
|
21
|
beginning it read that the legislative, executive and judicial
|