|
|
10,812
|
|
1
|
amendment is defeated, would it be in order for Delegate
|
|
2
|
Grant to later offer an amendment which would empower the
|
|
3
|
General Assembly to provide for removal of state elective
|
|
4
|
officers appointed for indefinite terms?
|
|
5
|
THE CHAIRMAN: It would not be in order if offered
|
|
6
|
any time after the Committee of the Whole concluded
|
|
7
|
consideration of GP-10 unless it were offered on second
|
|
8
|
reading. It would, of course, be entirely in order for
|
|
9
|
Delegate Grant or any other Delegate to submit a
|
|
10
|
proposal embodying this matter to the Committee, and the
|
|
11
|
Committee with the permission of the Convention could
|
|
12
|
support a subsequent Committee Recommendation.
|
|
13
|
Delegate Case.
|
|
14
|
DELEGATE CASE: Mr. Chairman, would it be in
|
|
15
|
order to suggest that this matter be laid over until
|
|
16
|
some time later this evening so that the amendment suggested
|
|
17
|
by a number of the delegates could be printed and laid
|
|
18
|
on the delegates' desk?
|
|
19
|
The reason I suggest this is that I think
|
|
20
|
we are now going to vote on something that Delegate Grant
|
|
21
|
himself doesn't want. He said he would accept the
|