|
|
10,810
|
|
1
|
the General Assembly would prescribe by law in the same
|
|
2
|
manner they prescribe jurisdiction for any of their present
|
|
5
|
courts, such as the Superior or District Court. They
|
|
4
|
would prescribe the jurisdiction of the review. They
|
|
5
|
may have original jurisdiction, however they want to do it,
|
|
6
|
if theTe is en enabling act to name them to impose on the
|
|
7
|
judiciary the duties of making the review of their
|
|
8
|
investigation.
|
|
9
|
THE CHAIRMAN: One more question, Delegate
|
|
10
|
Wheatley.
|
|
11
|
DELEGATE WHEATLEY: I will try to combine
|
|
12
|
this one.
|
|
13
|
In so doing, as I understand your answer, could
|
|
14
|
the General Assembly then provide for (a) little
|
|
15
|
or no review, or (b) review limited to certain issues
|
|
16
|
as to facts?
|
|
17
|
Would the review apply to apoointing a
|
|
18
|
successor or would it be limited? How detailed must
|
|
19
|
they be or must they provide for any review at all,
|
|
20
|
that is my real question?
|
|
21
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Grant.
|
