|
|
10,757
|
|
1
|
DELEGATE WILLONER: I am referring to the
|
|
2
|
selection process of the ten judges that would decide the
|
|
3
|
case for lack of a better word.
|
|
4
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Boyer, the question
|
|
5
|
Delegate Willoner asks is what number of judges in the
|
|
6
|
Court of Appeals is necessary to concur in the appoint-
|
|
7
|
ment of the special tribunal of ten? A majority of the
|
|
8
|
quorum or a majority of the whole court?
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE BOYER: The recommendation is silent
|
|
10
|
on this, but I would imagine like all other decisions of
|
|
11
|
the Court of Appeals the majority would prevail.
|
|
12
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Willoner.
|
|
13
|
DELEGATE WILLONER: Of a quorum.
|
|
14
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Bamberger.
|
|
15
|
DELEGATE BAMBERGER: Mr. Chairman, I just rise
|
|
16
|
because I think we have become confused. My recollection
|
|
17
|
from the judiciary article is that this always requires a
|
|
18
|
concurrence of four judges for any particular decision.
|
|
19
|
Even when they sit as a panel of five, a majority of
|
|
20
|
three is not sufficient to act and that it would
|
|
21
|
require a majority of four. I would suggest that the
|