|
|
10,745
|
|
1
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Hanson.
|
|
2
|
DELEGATE HANSON: Isn't the history of
|
|
3
|
impeachment and trials of impeachment by legislative
|
|
4
|
bodies one of seeking to remove elected officials from
|
|
5
|
office when there have been no justiciable causes of action
|
|
6
|
against them in some instances and in some instances
|
|
7
|
perhaps there was, but this may go beyond that?
|
|
8
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Boyer.
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE BOYER: I would concede that you have
|
|
10
|
a good point there. Of course, if a public official has
|
|
11
|
been convicted of some heinous crime that in itself in
|
|
12
|
a court of law would subject him to removal from a court
|
|
13
|
office. The impeachment proceeding would be that perhaps
|
|
14
|
for some reason public official "A" has not been convicted
|
|
15
|
of a felonious crime, and this would be a supplementary
|
|
16
|
proceeding.
|
|
17
|
DELEGATE HANSON: Why does your Committee
|
|
18
|
argue that in such case this can be conducted better in
|
|
19
|
a tribunal of judges than before the Senate?
|
|
20
|
THE CHAIRMAN: You say "in such case". By
|
|
21
|
that you mean what?
|