|
|
10,735
|
|
1
|
DELEGATE BOYER: We found, frankly, much to
|
|
2
|
my amazement, that our recommendation of GP-9 dealing
|
|
5
|
only with common law evidently did not go far enough in
|
|
4
|
order to protect the implementation of the various
|
|
5
|
statutory and constitutional concepts that we would like
|
|
6
|
to have incorporated in future case law and in the future
|
|
7
|
Constitution.
|
|
8
|
GP-9 dealing only with ancient statutory law
|
|
9
|
was the result, the finished product, of the General
|
|
10
|
Provisions Committee hearing many witnesses, including
|
|
11
|
judges on the Court of Appeals.
|
|
12
|
But on the Transitory Committee, particularly
|
|
13
|
the Local Government Committee, I had some problems that
|
|
14
|
did not fit in with our Recommendation GP-9 and this was
|
|
15
|
sort of like opening Pandora's box, and there were many
|
|
16
|
other matters that then flowed into the conversation that
|
|
17
|
evidently GP-9 which was our intention to cover everything,
|
|
18
|
did not.
|
|
19
|
For that reason we recommend for your
|
|
20
|
consideration the Amendment A on GP-9 and ask that it
|
|
21
|
be considered because we feel it to be more encompassing
|