|
|
10,709
|
|
1
|
oppose this amendment. I think the way this convention
|
|
2
|
itself has worked out is living proof of the validity and
|
|
3
|
necessity of having rules of operation we have had.
|
|
4
|
The legislature passed the Enabling Act which brought into
|
|
5
|
being the organic body of this convention.
|
|
6
|
I think it would be important to make doubly
|
|
7
|
sure, make crystal clear, and in a voice loud and clear
|
|
8
|
we want the future conventions to be equally as practical,
|
|
9
|
as efficient and as workable as this one has been. We
|
|
10
|
found that this convention has adopted its own rules of
|
|
11
|
procedure. I would dislike very much to have the next
|
|
12
|
convention, whenever it may be, not have that same right.
|
|
13
|
It is entirely possible that if this is not included in
|
|
14
|
the constitution, perhaps some other body, perhaps the
|
|
15
|
General Assembly, shall work out rules of procedure under
|
|
16
|
which the new constitutional convention may operate.
|
|
17
|
I think this would be unfortunate.
|
|
18
|
The way the General Provisions Committee has
|
|
19
|
worded the language in GP-8 on this particular point is
|
|
20
|
exactly the way we are working now. I have found it to
|
|
21
|
be efficient and a practical way to do it. I would like
|