|
|
10,659
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
the General Assembly may call a Consititutional Convention
|
|
2
|
without reference to the people. I wonder if you would
|
|
3
|
elaborate a little on the committee's rationale behind
|
|
4
|
that provision since it is not in our present law and has
|
|
5
|
inherent in it a good many dangers.
|
|
6
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Adkins, I couldn't
|
|
7
|
hear what you said. It is certainly something about our
|
|
8
|
present law.
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE ADKINS: I think it is unlike our
|
|
10
|
present that the the General Assembly can call a
|
|
11
|
Constitutional Convention without referring it to the
|
|
12
|
people for ratification. I find this troublesome.
|
|
13
|
would simply like reassurance as to their reasons for
|
|
14
|
the situation.
|
|
15
|
DELEGATE BOYER: We found there is a recent
|
|
16
|
case decided by the Court of Appeals, Board of Election
|
|
17
|
Supervisors v. Attorney General of Maryland decided
|
|
18
|
1967, which states authority to call a convention is
|
|
19
|
inherent in the state legislature. This spells out
|
|
20
|
the present case law on the subject.
|
|
21
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Adkins, the Chair
|