|
|
10,639
|
|
1
|
again a special interest group, well financed, could turn
|
|
2
|
the tide rather than the total representation of this
|
|
3
|
state, and I think there is a great fear here, and I think
|
|
4
|
this amendment should be rejected.
|
|
5
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Does any other Delegate desire
|
|
6
|
to speak in favor of the amendment?
|
|
7
|
Delegate Hanson,
|
|
8
|
DELEGATE HANSON: Mr. Chairman, I rarely find
|
|
9
|
myself in a position to disagree with my colleague from
|
|
10
|
Montgomery County, Mr. Scanlan. I share his lack of
|
|
11
|
enthusiasm for the legislative initiative. I was
|
|
12
|
opposed to the legislative initiative and I remain opposed
|
|
13
|
to the legislative initiative.
|
|
14
|
I do not think that as a practical matter it
|
|
15
|
has fulfilled the promises that were made for it when it
|
|
16
|
was developed. I am a sponsor of this amendment, and I
|
|
17
|
must say I am a sponsor of it with some degree of trepidatioi
|
|
18
|
because of my lack of enthusiasm for initiatives generally.
|
|
19
|
The reason I sponsor it, however, is for what 1
|
|
20
|
believe is a very practical reason in the development of
|
|
21
|
constitutional government. It is quite true that a
|