|
|
10,446
|
|
1
|
DELEGATE LORD: I anticipated that amendment
|
|
2
|
to some extent. I don't think it adds anything because
|
|
3
|
I think it further muddies the water. I think the point
|
|
4
|
has been made clear by Delegates Raley, Borom, Winslow and
|
|
5
|
Cardin, that no one knows what this clause means. Certain-
|
|
6
|
ly the Majority in the short space of one month from
|
|
7
|
November, or two weeks actually from November 9 to Novem-
|
|
8
|
ber 27, when it submitted its memorandum, has changed its
|
|
9
|
position entirely. Everyone in the Majority is quite clear
|
|
10
|
that it meant free tuition for as long as the child wanted
|
|
11
|
to go to school. Now they disavow this intention and say
|
|
12
|
that the words are "incapable of precise definition".
|
|
13
|
Now, if this confusion exists in this body, I
|
|
14
|
submit that this confusion is going to be compounded when
|
|
15
|
this language is incorporated into a document that is to
|
|
16
|
go to the people for application. I submit that it is a
|
|
17
|
litigation breeder of the worst sort; even without this
|
|
18
|
language in the State of Virginia there is a pending law-
|
|
19
|
suit brought by a county of the type that was described
|
|
20
|
by Dr. Pullen that receives small amounts of money from
|
|
21
|
the State to equalize that amount of money that is received
|