10,336

1

yes importance.

2

DELEGATE CLARK: Delegate Johnson.

S

DELEGATE JOHNSON: I was willing to accept

4

your language or the committee's language in Section 2 as

5

largely Oratory language. But in your answer to Delegate

6

Schloeder you indicated you meant something quite specific

7

by it when you said it would be measured in the result and

8

not in the input. I find this a little inconsistent with

9

your committee recommendation Section 2 and I am wondering

10

if you could expand exactly what you meant in answer to

11

Delegate Schloeder's question and whether or not that is

12

in conflict with Committee Recommendation 1, Section 2.

13

DELEGATE CLARK: Delegate Wheatley, the time is

14

up but we will allow you to answer this question.

15

DELEGATE WHEATLEY: I would say your earlier

16

assumption is correct. That the results must be measured

17

in a somewhat nondefinable term and you can't do it in

18

dollars and cents. It is basically something that must

19

be left to legislative determination as to how much is

20

enough. I think the committee recommendation is again in

21

that nature and my answer would certainly be the same.