|
|
10,250
|
|
1
|
Another thing some of them objected to was the fact that
|
|
2
|
removals were made at the last minute and in that amend-
|
|
3
|
ment we have provided that they shall be removed upon
|
|
4
|
the filing, within aereasonable time prior to trial, as
|
|
5
|
provided by law or by the Court of Appeals by rule, and
|
|
6
|
we think that that overcomes the objection. In fact,
|
|
7
|
some of them who were violently opposed to the committee's
|
|
8
|
original amendment are co-sponsors on this. You will
|
|
9
|
notice we have thirty-two people on this. We have tried
|
|
10
|
to reach a lot of the people who had objection to the
|
|
11
|
original draft of Section 8 and I do hope that you adopt
|
|
12
|
this amendment because I think it meets all the objections
|
|
13
|
and serves a very good purpose. It is something that has
|
|
14
|
been part of our law and procedure for a good many years.
|
|
15
|
I know that some of you will object to it
|
|
16
|
because we are not letting the Court of Appeals legislate
|
|
17
|
on everything. Some of us think the Court of Appeals
|
|
18
|
ought to be legislating and doing all these things;
|
|
19
|
because we haven't given them full sway, they object to
|
|
20
|
it. This does leave it in the hands of the legislature,
|
|
21
|
the elected people, and up for approval or rejection.
|