|
|
10,222
|
|
1
|
it up to the legislature to provide information such as
|
|
2
|
statistical records such as expenditures and salaries,
|
|
3
|
in other words, we would leave information of that kind
|
|
4
|
up to the legislature to decide whether the public
|
|
5
|
should know about it or not; is that right?
|
|
6
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Kiefer.
|
|
7
|
DELEGATE KIEFER: Delegate Koger, you have hit
|
|
8
|
it right on the head, because as originally proposed by
|
|
9
|
this minority report, it would open everything, and the
|
|
10
|
legislature would have to close it. This amendment that
|
|
11
|
I have offered instead would do the opposite. The
|
|
12
|
legislature could decide what the public ought to see
|
|
13
|
if it is necessary.
|
|
14
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Any further questions?
|
|
15
|
Delegate Chabot.
|
|
16
|
DELEGATE CHABOT: Delegate Kiefer, there had been
|
|
17
|
some discussion of an existing common-law right to certain
|
|
18
|
public records, and the language of your amendment would
|
|
19
|
seem to -- do I understand correctly that the language
|
|
20
|
of your amendment would permit those records to be
|
|
21
|
available to the public only to the extent and in the
|