|
|
10,220
|
|
1
|
am sorry, but I must pursue my question, Chairman Kiefer
|
|
2
|
has not answered my question.
|
|
3
|
How much consideration was given to this
|
|
4
|
substitute? Is it the substitute of the committee which
|
|
5
|
considered the language, or is it an amendment as would
|
|
6
|
be presented by Delegate Kiefer, or any other delegate,
|
|
7
|
and which we would consider in that light?
|
|
8
|
DELEGATE KIEFER: I do not d eny the pattern of
|
|
9
|
this. This is my idea, but I will say the concept of what
|
|
10
|
was to be in this -- the committee adopted the concept of
|
|
11
|
the right to know, but I don't remember that any specific
|
|
12
|
language was completely spelled out.
|
|
13
|
There was a lot of confusion about this, because
|
|
14
|
it was withdrawn by Delegate Hostetter, but there were
|
|
15
|
a number of efforts made to write something into our
|
|
16
|
recommendations, and this particular one, as a matter of
|
|
17
|
fact, was originally introd ued to the committee by
|
|
18
|
Delegate Weidemeyer, so we had a great deal of thought and
|
|
19
|
a great deal of conversation and a great deal of debate
|
|
20
|
and there was not any particular set forth.
|
|
21
|
The minority report so far as I know was not
|