|
|
10,190
|
|
1
|
as a judge.
|
|
2
|
DELEGATE JAMES: Delegate Willis.
|
|
3
|
DELEGATE WILLIS: Delegate Willoner, several
|
|
4
|
questions. I don't know quite how far this goes.
|
|
5
|
Suppose the head of an institution of higher
|
|
6
|
learning would like to have a staff meeting with the heads
|
|
7
|
of his departments. Would that be open and would he have
|
|
8
|
to give prior notice of it?
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE WILLONER: My opinion would be no, and
|
|
10
|
I might add in answering that, of course, this is subject
|
|
11
|
to judicial construction. There are a lot of open meeting
|
|
12
|
statutes on the books, Maryland has several. Of course,
|
|
13
|
Maryland has an automatic exclusion, where every meeting
|
|
14
|
shall be open where there is a decision taken. But you
|
|
15
|
can always have an executive session, but there is no
|
|
16
|
enforcement and no notice or anything else, and it is
|
|
17
|
pretty meaningless.
|
|
18
|
But where the language has some meaning the courts
|
|
19
|
have restricted it. I don't think you would have to worry
|
|
20
|
about staff meetings unless they were staff meetings where
|
|
21
|
you were going to decide something that needed to be
|