|
|
10,183
|
|
1
|
DELEGATE WIUONER: No, This would open up
|
|
2
|
such meetints if they were not protected "except as other-
|
|
3
|
wise provided by law." It is not a difficult matter. It
|
|
4
|
is a matter always raised. I am absolutely positive that
|
|
5
|
the legislature would so provide.
|
|
6
|
As far as that aspect is concerned, they could
|
|
7
|
adopt this freedom of information statute, and they would
|
|
8
|
certainly protect that situation,
|
|
9
|
Does that answer your question?
|
|
10
|
DELEGATE BENNETT: Not very satisfactorily.
|
|
11
|
To go to another question, what about a meeting
|
|
12
|
to consider the taking of a particular piece of property?
|
|
13
|
DELEGATE WILLONER: I just discussed that,
|
|
14
|
Delegate Bennett, and it would be an open meeting unless
|
|
15
|
the legislature protected it, and again in this statute
|
|
16
|
there is provision for the legislature to protect such a
|
|
17
|
meeting, it would have to be even broader than that because
|
|
18
|
as this points out, it would be something that would be
|
|
19
|
against the public interest; if it was against the public
|
|
20
|
interest to discuss the matter in public, then of course it
|
|
21
|
would be a closed meeting.
|