|
|
10,118
|
|
1
|
conflict with that due process part of the Constitution, by
|
|
2
|
limiting removal only to cases permitted by the rule
|
|
5
|
of the General Assembly?
|
|
4
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Willoner.
|
|
5
|
DELEGATE WILLONER: Well, it is not
|
|
6
|
intended to be in conflict with that. I will put it that
|
|
7
|
way.
|
|
8
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Delegate Mason.
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE MASON: I have no further question
|
|
10
|
but it appears confusing.
|
|
11
|
THE CHAIRMAN: Any further questions?
|
|
12
|
Delegate Mudd, I think what the Chair was think-
|
|
13
|
ing of was an earlier draft of some precedessor to section
|
|
14
|
5 of R&P-l. There was in an earlier draft a provision
|
|
15
|
that the accused was entitled to trial by an impartial jury
|
|
16
|
in the county where the crime was perpetuated. It is not
|
|
17
|
there now.
|
|
18
|
Delegate Bamberger.
|
|
19
|
DELEGATE BAMBERGER: Mr. Chairman, I would suggest
|
|
20
|
the question Delegate Mason raised may have some validity, and
|
|
21
|
I would ask the proposers of this amendment if they
|