|
|
10,080
|
|
1
|
DELEGATE MARION: Mr. Chairman, if that was in
|
|
2
|
response to my question — I think it was —
|
|
3
|
DELEGATE JAMES: That was a supplementary answer.
|
|
4
|
DELEGATE MARION: The question I am still seeking
|
|
5
|
an answer to, I appreciate the fact that this is language
|
|
6
|
in the Federal Constitution, but if it will have no
|
|
7
|
application, no application whatsoever to the state or cases
|
|
8
|
arising in the state, if we do not have an army or navy
|
|
9
|
why is there need just for the sake of carrying over the
|
|
10
|
language as it appears in the Federal Constitution to include
|
|
11
|
this language in the Maryland Constitution?
|
|
12
|
DELEGATE WEIDEMEYER: Those cases you are worried
|
|
13
|
about I think come under the federal jurisdiction of the
|
|
14
|
military.
|
|
15
|
DELEGATE JAMES: Does the state have military forces
|
|
16
|
DELEGATE WEIDEMEYER: In the Army or the Navy
|
|
17
|
they have military courts and certain offenses which are
|
|
18
|
offenses both under the federal law, under the Maryland
|
|
19
|
law or the state law can be prosecuted in the militayr courts
|
|
20
|
martial, by military court martial.
|
|
21
|
They are in the military.
|