|
|
10,073
|
|
1
|
DELEGATE CARDIN : Would it Be in order to suggest
|
|
2
|
that if there is no objection that the committee on
|
|
3
|
Style and Drafting consider the same terminology?
|
|
4
|
DELEGATE WEIDEMEYER: I would not agree to that.
|
|
5
|
I think "infamous" has its legal significance and we
|
|
6
|
ought nto tamper around with that.
|
|
7
|
DELEGATE JAMES: Delegate Byrnes , for what purpose
|
|
8
|
do you rise?
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE BYRNES: Just to ask a question, if I
|
|
10
|
may.
|
|
11
|
DELEGATE JAMES: Will the Delegate yield?
|
|
12
|
DELEGATE WEIDEMEYER: If I may.
|
|
13
|
DELEGATE BYRNES: Did I understand you to say
|
|
14
|
that the term "infamous" may include misdemeanors?
|
|
15
|
DELEGATE WEIDEMEYER: I said, now, that what I
|
|
16
|
said was my own personal opinion, that some of our crimes
|
|
17
|
in our criminal code are categorized as misdemeanors , and I
|
|
18
|
personally would consider them in the more serious
|
|
19
|
categories. What the legislature will do in redefining
|
|
20
|
them, I do not know, but to my mind, infamous imports the
|
|
21
|
rather more serious crime.
|