|
|
10,070
|
|
1
|
or otherwise infamous cases, we should have it specifically
|
|
2
|
provided either in the declaration of rights or in our
|
|
3
|
judiciary article.
|
|
4
|
That is all I have to say for that, and there
|
|
5
|
has been no amendments offered.
|
|
6
|
I do not assume, or I assume that there is no objec-
|
|
7
|
tion to that being in our Constitution.
|
|
8
|
DELEGATE HENDERSON: May I ask a question?
|
|
9
|
DELEGATE JAMES: Will Delegate Weidemeyer yield
|
|
10
|
to a question?
|
|
11
|
DELEGATE WEIDEMEYER: Yes.
|
|
12
|
DELEGATE HENDERSON: Since Section 11, I understood
|
|
13
|
you to say, is not in our present Constitution, and since
|
|
14
|
there is a regular procedure whereby most of thecases
|
|
15
|
come up on information and not by indictment, would
|
|
16
|
there be any intention here to change that present practice
|
|
17
|
which has worked so well?
|
|
18
|
DELEGATE WEIDEMEYER: No, I do not think so because
|
|
19
|
this follows the wording of the Federal Constitution,
|
|
20
|
no person shall be held to answer for a capital
|
|
21
|
or otherwise infamous crime, unless on presentment or
|