|
|
10,033
|
|
1
|
provision is unnecessary and that it harms the accused as
|
|
2
|
much as it helps him.
|
|
3
|
DELEGATE JAMES: Anyone wish to speak against the
|
|
4
|
amendment? Delegate Willoner?
|
|
5
|
DELEGATE WILLONER: Mr. Chairman, when I spoke on
|
|
6
|
this in presenting the majority report, I indicated to the
|
|
7
|
body when I came down here that I thought this provision was
|
|
8
|
archaic and outmoded until I began to do some research on
|
|
9
|
it and began to develop some questions which I may add in
|
|
10
|
discussing with Delegates Bothe and Moser have not been
|
|
11
|
satisfactorily answered.
|
|
12
|
The case of Sharp and Hanson v. The United States
|
|
13
|
is a case of first degree murder where the judge was pre-
|
|
14
|
cluded from instructing or refused to instruct on the issue
|
|
15
|
of manslaughter.
|
|
16
|
The Supreme Court held that this was appropriate
|
|
17
|
since the evidence was only susceptible of one interpreta-
|
|
16
|
tion, first degree murder, and therefore a manslaughter in-
|
|
19
|
struction was inappropriate.
|
|
20
|
We in Maryland do not follow that practice. I
|
|
21
|
contend that when the Commission took this out of the present
|