|
|
10,005
|
|
1
|
national level by the old age security, unemployment,
|
|
2
|
and I think we can well set forward that goal here. We
|
|
3
|
don't have to resort to a lot of outworn chivalries
|
|
4
|
about the welfare states and about laissez faire in
|
|
5
|
the economy and about rugged individualism. That went
|
|
6
|
down to the worse defeat in history. We are here to set
|
|
7
|
goals. One of the specific reasons that we need this is
|
|
8
|
because as time goes on perhaps it is indeed going to
|
|
9
|
be possible for the states to share some of the revenues
|
|
10
|
that are now being collected by the federal government, and
|
|
11
|
if that day comes, if we are to strengthen our state
|
|
12
|
government and get rid of the federal bulldozer, then we
|
|
13
|
have got to have something in our Constitution that sets
|
|
14
|
the direction toward which we are going and the direction
|
|
15
|
toward which we are going is the protection and upholding
|
|
16
|
of individual worthiness, dignity.
|
|
17
|
That is the goal we want to set, and I think
|
|
18
|
that this is not holding out a vain hope to the people of
|
|
19
|
Maryland at all. It is setting a goal towards which we
|
|
20
|
shall go and I hope indeed that Mr. Scanlan's amendment
|
|
21
|
is defeated and if necessary, we can go to the merits of
|